This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Mon Oct 10 10:01:51 CEST 2022
>> Inside-AS DNS >> Outside-AS DNS >> RFC1918 DNS We probably need a "localhost DNS" too I would still argue that the "big" public resolvers warrant their own tags. > Apart from that, should there be separate tags for RFC1918 > and ULA? Paraphrasing a quote from may decades ago: "probe DNS tagging is like math - a simple idea but it can get complicated" :-) We could separate IPv4 and IPv6 tags in this context. Which is clearer but also more complicated to process. Still, for each af, probes could get multiple of these tags. I believe it would be informative if we assembled some statistics about the current state, ie. how many probes would get what kind of tags if we applied them today. Perhaps Max already has some up his sleeve? Regards, Robert
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]