This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] V5 probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] V5 probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] V5 probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bjørn Mork
bjorn at mork.no
Mon Oct 3 08:44:42 CEST 2022
Alexander Burke via ripe-atlas <ripe-atlas at ripe.net> writes: > Micro-USB is mechanically inferior: less reliable (easier to > accidentally disconnect) and less robust than USB Type-C. Maybe... But you can do a lot better than Type-C for power connector if that's the criteria. Even the smallest barrel connectors are more robust than a Type-C connector. Wrt the accidental disconnects I'm not even sure Type-C is better than Micro-USB. I'd like to see some statistics. A rarely disconnected Micro-USB connector will have the two "hooks" intact, and will be pretty hard to disconnect even if you pull the wire. I don't think it's fair to compare Type-C to a Micro-USB connector which is worn-out due to regular re-connection, if that's what you're thinking about. Anecdotically, my experience is that the Type-C is easily disconnected by a dog, using only his paws... But it wasn't my intention to campaign against Type-C. I just wondered what made that part of the design significant enough to make a wishlist. I'd rather see PoE if you really want to make the power connector more reliable. But I accept the price vs value arguments previously made against PoE. Bjørn
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] V5 probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] V5 probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]