This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Overuse of software probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Overuse of software probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Credits Request
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Emile Aben
emile.aben at ripe.net
Wed Jun 29 14:34:08 CEST 2022
> Emile Aben, I would be happy to see code for detecting overly similar > probes. It would save a lot of time spend on data filtering. > These are snapshots of data for probe similarity detection [1] in IPv4 and IPv6 https://sg-pub.ripe.net/emile/probe-similarity/probe_similarity_ipv4-2022-06-29.csv https://sg-pub.ripe.net/emile/probe-similarity/probe_similarity_ipv6-2022-06-29.csv This calculates 3 similarity values between 0 and 1 (the last 3 values in the csv). Pick the middle one if you don't care about the details. There are 54k probe-pairs with similarity values over 0.5, 7.4k with value over 0.95 6.7k with value over 0.99 My gut feeling is that anything over 0.95 is likely very redundant for many types of measurements. There seems to be a cluster of about 400 probes that are very similar to each other, and a couple of smaller clusters too. Happy to work with you and others to see if we can make this into something that is operationally valuable. kind regards, Emile Aben RIPE NCC [1] Holterbach, Thomas, et al. "Measurement vantage point selection using a similarity metric." Proceedings of the Applied Networking Research Workshop. 2017. https://trac.ietf.org/trac/irtf/export/478/www/content/anrw/2017/anrw17-final9.pdf
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Overuse of software probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Credits Request
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]