This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Proposal: Measure well-known CDNs,[CDN-HTTP]
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Proposal: Measure well-known CDNs,[CDN-HTTP]
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Proposal: Measure well-known CDNs,[CDN-HTTP]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Massimo Candela
massimo at ntt.net
Sat Dec 17 03:00:26 CET 2022
On 17/12/2022 00:19, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote: > > >> On Dec 16, 2022, at 23:29, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: >> >> There is a larger problem here, a more strategic one: such a feature >> would contribute to the centralisation of the Internet, which is >> already too important. Tagging some targets are "important" and >> "worthy of measurements" would mean that we consider some HTTP servers >> to be more useful than others. That would be a bad message from RIPE. > > We’ve come full circle - we started with centralized PTTs - moved to a decentralized ASN/Paul Baran model - now Re-centralized based on marketing domination. > > +1 with Stephane’s observation. The selection of who to measure is a statement. +1 Also, while the data would be useful, I don't think the role of the ripe ncc is to grade commercial services. Let other companies or individual researchers do that.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Proposal: Measure well-known CDNs,[CDN-HTTP]
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Proposal: Measure well-known CDNs,[CDN-HTTP]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]