This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Feb 17 17:56:07 CET 2021
> In short, supporting this request is going to take only a tiny bit of > time to support. don't forget to include the time to read all the email discussion about it. :) > I just did a small experiment with the probe firmware. Allowing > 240.0.0.0/4 and 0.0.0.0/8 is a two line change. I tested this on V3 > and V4 probes and on CentOS 7. In all 3 cases, the linux kernel does > support 240.0.0.0/4 and does not support 0.0.0.0/8. so, what experiment(s) do you think would be useful once some capable probes deploy? > We are not going to releasing new firmware for V1 and V2 (except to > address security issues). i can not get to my v1 probes during covid lockdown even if you shipped replacements to me :( < snif > will you upgrade soft probes? or send instructions? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]