This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] credit differences between probes?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] credit differences between probes?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe firmware source code
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Fri Jan 18 11:11:22 CET 2019
On 2019-01-14 17:01, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:45 AM Bruno Pagani <bruno.pagani at ens-lyon.org > <mailto:bruno.pagani at ens-lyon.org>> wrote: > > Now that I’m back on a computer, I confirm what I said above and > also can tell you that the detail is available at: > > https://atlas.ripe.net/user/credits/ > > You’ll see “Probe uptime” entries of 21600 (or below in case of > downtime) and some “For results delivered” with various amounts. > > Ah! ok, yes I see 21600 for just being alive and slightly different > amounts for 'results delivered'. thanks for the pointer. > -chris I can confirm this to be "the algorithm" :-) This "bonus" was introduced a couple of years ago mostly because some probes are much more popular than others and it just seemed fair to recognise and rewaerd this. Regards, Robert
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] credit differences between probes?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe firmware source code
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]