This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Communication with probes' owners
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Communication with probes' owners
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Communication with probes' owners
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ponikierski, Grzegorz
gponikie at akamai.com
Tue Apr 23 13:10:49 CEST 2019
I thought about simple web form available only for logged users of RIPE Atlas. In this way all private data are hidden and RIPE can rate limit usage of the form. Message itself can be send to probe's owner via email from RIPE Atlas infra so sender identity also can be hidden. If somebody wants to switch to email communication then form can also be used to exchange email addresses. Regards, Grzegorz From: Martin Boissonneault <ve2mrx at hotmail.com> Date: Monday 2019-04-22 at 02:25 To: Carsten Schiefner <carsten at schiefner.de> Cc: "ripe-atlas at ripe.net" <ripe-atlas at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [atlas] Communication with probes' owners The best might be for RIPE to contact the owner when the records don't match what is detected from the probe? Some method to trigger a check could be added to the probe's profile, and there would not be ANY chance of email abuse by throwaway accounts? Allowing users to contact probe owners has to be VERY well made to avoid all sorts of attacks and spam! Martin Boissonneault Sent from my iPhone On Apr 21, 2019, at 18:14, Carsten Schiefner <carsten at schiefner.de<mailto:carsten at schiefner.de>> wrote: Am 21.04.2019 um 19:59 schrieb Dave . <gboonie at gmail.com<mailto:gboonie at gmail.com>>: If this gets implemented, please add a checkbox where one can indicate whether one is a user or also can get things fixed in the AS where your probe is connected. Makes sense to me: +1. Would then a reminder every 1/2/3 month[s] make sense that this is (still) the case aka. this flag to be set? As the probe’s circumstances may change... Op vr 19 apr. 2019 om 12:37 schreef Paolo Pozzan <paolo.pozzan at telemar.it<mailto:paolo.pozzan at telemar.it>>: It seems a good idea. I don't think this will be abused and in case it would be easy to point out the spammers. Would this be useful also for other kind of messages? Paolo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20190423/335f096f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Communication with probes' owners
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Communication with probes' owners
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]