This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] contacing probe owner.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] contacing probe owner.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probes fluctuation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
carsten at schiefner.de
Sat Apr 20 14:16:44 CEST 2019
Hi Geert Jan - On 20.04.2019 13:49, Geert Jan de Groot wrote: >> Quite the opposite IMHO, understanding that the anticipated means of >> communication will be email and that the email address of a probe's host >> will be generic, eg. <ripe-atlas-probe-[number]@atlas.ripe.net>, >> redirecting all incoming emails to a final address. The redirection >> would be configured via the portal then. > > Using an address as described above would allow enumeration attacks. true. OTOH & as I wrote: I don't really care. > If it would use a hash instead it would be safer. > > The hash for probe XXX would be obtainable via the portal, where you > would need to look up probe's details anyway. Do I? Always? I have attempted to deploy KISS here - but anyhow: I'd obviously also be fine with a more advanced (definition thereof) solution. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] contacing probe owner.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probes fluctuation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]