This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lorenzo Colitti
lorenzo at google.com
Tue Jun 12 04:47:40 CEST 2018
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:44 AM James Andrewartha <jandrewartha at ccgs.wa.edu.au> wrote: > > Many would argue that the setup is already broken in many ways and > > that this is just one bit of breakage that you happened to notice. > > So what is your recommendation for IPv6 multi-homing without BGP? For the home, homenet protocols. For small enterprises, draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras, which is about to become an RFC. For larger enterprises, draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming .
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]