This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Probe name rules
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] New on RIPE Labs: Sketching Connectivity Between Users
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe name rules
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel AJ Sokolov
listclient at sokolov.eu.org
Sun Jun 3 11:37:23 CEST 2018
Hello, I would like to suggest a naming convention for probes that excludes names referring to features or networks which are not present/supported. For example, I see a probe that contains in its name a large network, although the probe is actually connected to competitor networks. (I assume the probe's host changed their ISP and forgot to update the probe's name.) Such naming is misleading for Atlas users, but also opens a can of worms in relation to trade mark law. Similarly, a prove with "IPv6" in its name that doesn't support IPv6 could be confusing. BR Daniel AJ
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] New on RIPE Labs: Sketching Connectivity Between Users
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe name rules
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]