This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Long response times using one-off measurements with old probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Long response times using one-off measurements with old probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Long response times using one-off measurements with old probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
philip.homburg at ripe.net
Fri Dec 14 15:08:55 CET 2018
On 2018/12/14 15:03 , Moritz Muller wrote: > Some small additional delays have been documented before on the RIPE Atlas website and in research papers [1, 2], but the big delay with one off measurements was new to me. > > Also to others? Is our assumption correct that the scheduler is the culprit? So far my investigation shows that the measurement actually takes that long. Why is not clear at the moment, but it doesn't seem to be anything external to the probe. It also doesn't seem to be interference from other measurements. Philip -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20181214/33e0c0f1/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Long response times using one-off measurements with old probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Long response times using one-off measurements with old probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]