This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Trying to measure Quad9 latency
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Trying to measure Quad9 latency
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Trying to measure Quad9 latency
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Thu Nov 23 02:23:48 CET 2017
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:27:42PM +0000, > Eduardo Duarte <eduardo.duarte at dns.pt> wrote > a message of 289 lines which said: > >> When I got the results from the measurement they were not what I >> expected.... The measurements to Quad9 had high value of REFUSAL. > > You did not set the RD (Recursion Desired) bit. Most resolvers refuse > these queries, to avoid cache snooping. > > Compare with #10290443, which have: > > Recursion desired True I also created this measurement, which is a ping one to measure latency to identify what countries receive a poor response. https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/10291137/#!probes - jared
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Trying to measure Quad9 latency
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Trying to measure Quad9 latency
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]