This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Fwd: [mat-wg] Atlas: DNS TCP Errors
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Fwd: [mat-wg] Atlas: DNS TCP Errors
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Fwd: [mat-wg] Atlas: DNS TCP Errors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John
ripe-atlas at johnbond.org
Tue Mar 14 22:37:16 CET 2017
Hi Philip, On 14/03/2017 15:45, Philip Homburg wrote: > Hi John, > > On 2017/03/14 14:49 , John wrote: >> feature request, when preforming DNS queries over TCP would it be >> possible for the probe to differentiate between a timeout and a TCP >> Reset. Currently the result just records the following when it gets a >> reset[1]. >> >> `error.timeout: 5000` > > I'll create a ticket for that. I have no idea about the ETA at the moment. Awesome thanks, no need for ETA just wanted to get it on the radar >> A similar feature to record ICMP prohibited for udp queries would also >> be useful but likely much harder. > > I wonder if the retry option would help here. The second send should get > an error from the kernel if the previous one resulted in an error ICMP. > > Actually getting the ICMP is possibly too hard, but a send error may > help a bit. But it requires some experimenting to see if this approach > would work. a bit to low level, kernel, socket programing for me but a quick google produces this if it helps """ Normally, UDP pretty much ignores ICMP errors, so if you want to see them, you need to open a raw socket to receive all ICMP packets and look for ones relevant to your socket. On Linux, at least, an alternative is to set the IP_RECVERR socket option. If you do that, you can do a recvmsg with the MSG_ERRQUEUE flag set to get any ICMP (or other) errors associated with your socket. This has the advantage of not requiring elevated privileges or a second socket. """ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23118113/c-sockets-send-udp-and-process-icmp-reply-from-router Thanks
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Fwd: [mat-wg] Atlas: DNS TCP Errors
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Fwd: [mat-wg] Atlas: DNS TCP Errors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]