This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] probe congestion?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe congestion?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe congestion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bajpai, Vaibhav
v.bajpai at jacobs-university.de
Wed May 11 12:46:31 CEST 2016
> On 11 May 2016, at 12:25, Paul Vlaar <pvlaar at afilias.info> wrote: > > while running a DNS UDM on a fixed set of (reused from a previous UDM) probes, I noticed the following. When I start 6 UDMs against the same set using the web UI, as a one-off measurement, starting "now", the RTTs for all of the measurements shoots up on all of the probes (500-1000+ ms). When I start the 6 tests individually, the RTTs are much lower, and close to what I'd expect them to be. > > It appears to me that when multiple UDMs are scheduled on the same probe, these should be run in serial, not parallel, in order to not run into congestion issues. Or am I simply expecting the wrong behaviour, and should I not schedule one-off measurements in parallel in the first place? This is known [a, b]. RTT timestamps are applied in user-space. As such, if a probe is loaded with multiple measurements, the user-space time stamping will be delayed. These delays will be more pronounced on v1/v2 probes. v3 probes reduce the impact of user-space timestamping. As such, v3 probes are more suitable for latency measurements that require high precision accuracy. RIPE atlas system tags can be used to separate probes by h/w version. [a] http://www.sigcomm.org/sites/default/files/ccr/papers/2015/July/0000000-0000005.pdf [b] http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2015/papers/p437.pdf > ~paul Best, Vaibhav =================================== Vaibhav Bajpai www.vaibhavbajpai.com Room 91, Research I School of Engineering and Sciences Jacobs University Bremen, Germany =================================== -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20160511/da50bc45/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe congestion?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe congestion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]