This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] HTTP measurements at willing targets / protocol suggestion
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Scheduling a test for all probes?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] 500 Probe limit
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gil Bahat
gil at magisto.com
Wed Jan 27 12:27:38 CET 2016
Hi, Is there any place where we can have a full list of reasoning as to what's blocking HTTP measurements? The above discussion does not relate to the risks posed to the clients by HTTP measurements (monetary, regulatory/legal), which mandates a mechanism that only willing probe hosts enter it. OTOH I don't understand the abuse scenario from the host side (i.e. if I register evil.whatever and I'm hosting it, who can I damage aside from myself and my own hosting bill? that's unclear to me) as long as the probe's capabilities are Regards, Gil Bahat, Director of Online Operations, Magisto Ltd. On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote: > On 2015/11/16 12:00 , Emil Stahl Pedersen wrote: > > +1 > > Sounds like a perfect solution > > 👍 > > Sounds like it is open for abuse. Someone registers evil.whatever, > passes all validation checks and can then serve any content he likes. > > No way to find out who set it up. > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20160127/dbb71e95/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Scheduling a test for all probes?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] 500 Probe limit
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]