This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] What is 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] What is 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] What is 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gil Bahat
gil at magisto.com
Sat Jan 9 16:24:48 CET 2016
I am setting this tag on all my probes, which probably accounts for at least half that number... Imho Non compliance with BCP38 invites trouble and I'd like this eradicated from here, personally. On Jan 9, 2016 5:07 PM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 04:00:35PM +0100, > Jeroen van der Ham <jeroen at dckd.nl> wrote > a message of 27 lines which said: > > > Using these tags is probably a silent protest against this > > decision ;) > > Geert said it was *his* probe so I assume he did not set the tag. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20160109/60b9508d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] What is 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] What is 'iwantbcp38compliancetesting' user tag?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]