This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Possible reasons behind a failed measurement
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Possible reasons behind a failed measurement
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Possible reasons behind a failed measurement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Strikos
astrikos at ripe.net
Fri Sep 25 17:54:29 CEST 2015
Hi, from what I see in our database you have specified as excluded tags "IPv6 Works" and " IPv6 Doesn't Work", which are mutually excluded :) Besides that, anchors are IPv6 capable so these leaves you with 0 anchros. I guess if you create a new measurement without specifying ""IPv6 Works" in the exclusion tags you will get the anchors you want. Regards, Andreas Strikos Ripe NCC On 24/09/15 15:34, Wenqin SHAO wrote: > Dear list, > > I recently launched a ping measurement that selects 50 anchors > worldwide for a period of 24 hours, id 2439518. The measurement > failed with no probe allocated to it. > Do you have any clue on the possible reasons for that? > One of my guesses is that anchors are highly demanded and non of them > were available during the measurement window. > I’d love to hear you thinkings on this matter. > > Many thanks for your attention. > > Best regards, > Wenqin Shao > > ---- > Ph.D candidate > Telecom ParisTech -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20150925/9252d030/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Possible reasons behind a failed measurement
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Possible reasons behind a failed measurement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]