This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Question about the hardware
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Question about the hardware
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Question about the hardware
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Fri Oct 30 14:15:54 CET 2015
On 2015-10-30 20:47, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:22:14 +0200 > Micha Bailey <michabailey at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just got my Probe, and I was wondering what the thought/planning process >> was when they were designed. Why use a $40 wireless router/access point? I >> would have thought that cheaper options would be available that provide the >> requirements (processor and a network port). > > I don't have a new style probe, but don't they use a device like this? > http://embeddedtimes.blogspot.de/2011/09/tp-link-tl-wr703n-tiny-linux-capable.html > It was $23 even back in 2011, and today can be found for around $20 including > shipping. > http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-TP-Link-TL-WR703N-Ultra-Mini-Portable-3G-802-11b-150Mbps-WiFi-Wireless-Router-TL/32339229235.html > Should be even cheaper if you order in bulk, as the probe designers likely did. The 702/703 don't have enough local storage for our case and don't have USB ports either -- otherwise I think they are basically the same as the MR3020 which we use as v3 probe. Cheers, Robert
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Question about the hardware
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Question about the hardware
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]