This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] VM probes (was Re: Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas)
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] VM probes (was Re: Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas)
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Wed Nov 11 16:47:02 CET 2015
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Sebastian Neuner <sebastian at sneuner.org> wrote a message of 55 lines which said: > It's important for the Atlas measurements to be comparable, which > can be a problem if you just run a virtual probe on someones > hardware in a datacenter somewhere. Or to put it simple: we want to > measure networks, not virtualization hardware. [Full agreement here] > Also, since people are using the results for scientific purposes, it > should at least be possible to differentiate between results of > hardware and software probes. I assume that, should it be done, we would have system tags to differentiate them?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] VM probes (was Re: Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas)
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]