This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 18:10:59 CET 2015
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Roman Mamedov <rm at romanrm.net> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:43:31 +0100 > Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote: > >> Using both ULA and global addresses may / will confuse some operating >> systems and applications. I haven't seen it for my self but while >> researching this topic for a customer all I found was "DO NOT DO THIS IT >> WILL BREAK THINGS!" > > Nope it will absolutely not. This is a very strong statement ;) >Whatever you have been reading, was written > either by a somewhat misinformed person (putting it mildly), or you maye have > misread/misunderstood something. Or those people have to deal with hosts which did not implemented RFC6724 and used default address selection algorithm as it is defined in RFC3483. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]