This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Thu Mar 26 16:43:31 CET 2015
Andre Keller <ak at list.ak.cx> writes: > Why would you bother with NAT66 in this case? I mean using ULA for local > traffic (like printing, filesharing, building control etc.) seems fine > to me. For global connectivity you could just use SLAAC or DHCPv6 as an > additional address? Using both ULA and global addresses may / will confuse some operating systems and applications. I haven't seen it for my self but while researching this topic for a customer all I found was "DO NOT DO THIS IT WILL BREAK THINGS!" Jens -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at jabber.quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [ipv6-wg] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]