This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roman Mamedov
rm at romanrm.net
Thu Mar 26 13:45:15 CET 2015
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:12:52 +0100 Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:24:54AM +0100, Pier Carlo Chiodi wrote: > > > behind an IPv6 NAT box. It also allows to have statistics on ULA usage. > > Atlas should be used as an Internet measurement tool, not as a reconnaissance > mechanism for the hosts' networks. ULA only equals "no IPv6" in my opinion. This is still within the scope of determining "are we on the Internet". If the probe only has an ULA, but gets a default (or a 2000::/3, etc) route, and a connection request to a GUA IP succeeds, then yes we are, nonwithstanding through which perverse NAT66 means the host has chosen to provide the connectivity. -- With respect, Roman -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20150326/fbacc4e0/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]