This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] [UDM] Consistency in the timeout parameter
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [UDM] Consistency in the timeout parameter
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [UDM] Consistency in the timeout parameter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Fri Jul 31 12:10:58 CEST 2015
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:06:14PM +0200, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote a message of 7 lines which said: > For DNS I can't remember anyone talking out it. Count me in. > Do you have a specific use case? Yes, today, tools.ietf.org has a DNS problem and the majority of the probes do not send back an answer in time (those who do return SERVFAIL). I wanted to increase the timeout.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [UDM] Consistency in the timeout parameter
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [UDM] Consistency in the timeout parameter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]