This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] [mat-wg] Proposal for public HTTP measurements
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] Proposal for public HTTP measurements
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] Proposal for public HTTP measurements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike.
the.lists at mgm51.com
Wed Jan 21 17:51:36 CET 2015
On 1/21/2015 at 2:28 PM Robert Kisteleki wrote: |On 2015-01-14 16:32, Mike. wrote: |> |> My only request in this discussion: |> |> If the decision is to allow http measurements, please allow me to |> select whether or not I want to avail the probe I host for public |> http measurements. |> |> A checkbox on the website for the probe (similar to the ~allow for |> public use~ selection) would be fine. |> |> Thanks. | |Hi, | |Our proposal restricts the target to be safe sites with little bandwidth |requirements -- this addresses most of the concerns of probe hosts. Of |course we can look into opting out from these if there's consensus that we |should. | |Regards, |Robert ============= Part of my concern is that the definition of "safe sites" can be country-dependent, and is continually changing. What may be a "safe site" this month may not be a "safe site" next month, due to some over-eager political cause somewhere.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] Proposal for public HTTP measurements
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] Proposal for public HTTP measurements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]