[atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops

Hi Randy,
On 9 December 2015 at 20:33:46, Randy Bush (randy at psg.com) wrote:

> Fully agreed, but I still don’t see why they are downplaying the event 
> like this. 

as shumon tweeted, this was the intersection of what the root ops were 
willing to say. given that, i am surprised they said anything at all. 
i guess they had to say something, and this was about as little that 
could be said to be 'something'; impressively content free.  

an interesting measurement experiment (not atlas) might be to see the 
smallest number of PR departments needed to remove all useful content 
from a post-mortem. :) 
well, that was the point I was trying to make: when you do a PR, people usually expect to learn something.

In that case, I got the feeling that I learnt absolutely nothing, while the PR was kind of finger-pointing 

to solutions such as Atlas, telling that they do not necessarily represent real life.

While this is true (as pointed out by Daniel), I found it quite awkward…



Cheers,

-- 

Nico
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20151211/8665b5f9/attachment.html>