This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Turris Omnia as probe Platform?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Turris Omnia as probe Platform?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Map-based visualisations for Atlas data
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Dec 5 02:59:50 CET 2015
> I think there is no lack of "interesting platforms to host a VM", but > the point of the discussion was "virtualizing measurements leads to > unreliable results as you do not control the hardware well enough" - and > for that reason, I'd strongly discourage *any* sort of VM solution. i strongly agree that vms risk reducing the precision of results. i am less sure this makes them useless or dangerous if clearly marked, as in probe version, perhaps. heck, if i want precision below ~15ms, i would be leery of v1 and v2 probes. otoh, nlring is mostly virtual and has its uses. but probes are so small and sufficiently cheap that i question the utility of maintaining a vm-based infrastructure. ymmv. randy, a researcher who uses atlas data, sometimes for timing sometimes not
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Turris Omnia as probe Platform?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Map-based visualisations for Atlas data
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]