[atlas] UDM limit?

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:55:01PM +0200, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> It'd be pretty difficult to administer quotas per target. Instead, our line
> of thinking at the moment is:
> * to separate the one-offs from the ongoing measurements; ie. there should
> be X one-off and X ongoing slots. This would allow users to do ad-hoc
> measurements even if the destination is otherwise well-measured
> * to switch to a model where we calculate the expected load on the target,
> like probes*frequency/time_interval, instead of pure number of measurements
> (which can have 1..10..100.1000 probes). In this model one could start a new
> measurement against a target even if there are a 1000 running already, as
> long as those measurements are not too heavy

I think both models are useful :-) - one-off and ongoing to have separate
quotas, and changing the actual quota calculation to some (obviously arbitrary)
"packets per minute" number or such.

Higher ppm values for well-known targets, like "all anchors", that signal
their willingness to receive packets.

Gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20140918/53dcb93b/attachment.sig>