This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Network configuration / Multiple VLANs
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Network configuration / Multiple VLANs
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Network configuration / Multiple VLANs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guillaume Sachot
gsachot at oceanet-technology.com
Wed Feb 26 14:54:04 CET 2014
> You don't have a "guest" VLAN for "here any visitor can plug in their laptop, and have internet-only (no internal services whatsoever) IPv4+IPv6 access"? The guest network is WiFi based. > Also having IPv4 and IPv6 in separate VLANs seems like a sign that whoever did the v6 deployment had little idea of wtf they are even doing. I wonder > if many people have such a wretched configuration that it would warrant adding the whole VLAN option to the interface. That's a bit presumptuous. Maybe the IPv6 VLAN is dedicated to this kind of external probes, and that we don't want to waste IPv4 by creating a dedicated one for the IPv4 counterpart when it can be put on an existing public range. -----Message d'origine----- De : Roman Mamedov [mailto:rm at romanrm.net] Envoyé : mercredi 26 février 2014 14:24 À : Guillaume Sachot Cc : ripe-atlas at ripe.net Objet : Re: [atlas] Network configuration / Multiple VLANs On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:28:14 +0100 Guillaume Sachot <gsachot at oceanet-technology.com> wrote: > I also thought of that, but I cannot adapt a datacenter network only > for one probe :) You don't have a "guest" VLAN for "here any visitor can plug in their laptop, and have internet-only (no internal services whatsoever) IPv4+IPv6 access"? Just place the probe into that same VLAN, it can't be trusted as it communicates with an external server and unconditionally accepts firmware upgrades from it anyway. Also having IPv4 and IPv6 in separate VLANs seems like a sign that whoever did the v6 deployment had little idea of wtf they are even doing. I wonder if many people have such a wretched configuration that it would warrant adding the whole VLAN option to the interface. -- With respect, Roman
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Network configuration / Multiple VLANs
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Network configuration / Multiple VLANs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]