This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Sun Sep 8 13:45:13 CEST 2013
On 07.09.2013, at 19:39 , Joe Provo <jzp-ripe at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote: > There was traffic seeming to support the idea of a properly opted-in > method (as recently as 30 July) but there hadn't been specifics > regarding the implementation nor commitment that it would get to > such a one. :-) And there was traffic clearly opposed to the idea as well. I cannot see any consensus there yet, one way or the other. And then there is the question of cost to implement and priorities ... Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]