This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Fri Oct 25 13:59:12 CEST 2013
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:14:41PM +0200, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > One obvious bug is that this behavior is not documented. It is much worse: it _is_ documented and the documentation is wrong. I spent two hours on that this morning and, as you can imagine, I'm not happy. > Another thing is that just silently setting the flag is not optimal, It is not "not optimal", it is _wrong_. > maybe the measurement should have been rejected instead. And the documentation fixed!
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]