This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Question about rt definition of DNS measurements
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Question about rt definition of DNS measurements
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Problems with one-off measurements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Sun Oct 6 17:44:09 CEST 2013
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:50:11AM +0200, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > When doing DNS measurements I see that the average "rt" time is > considerable higher when setting the DO bit. I cannot reproduce it. Are you sure it isn't a caching effect? I tried on a hot cache (using the same set of probes for three measurements, one with the DO bit to warm the cache, then one without the DO bit and one with, both using a hot cache). Compare public measurements #1032220 and #1032221, the one with the DO bit is even a bit faster: Without DO : Measurement #1032220 for www.afnic.fr uses 488 probes 467 probes, 432 got a reply, 15 replies unparseable, 0 probes were apparently using a validator Average RT is 66.67 ms Test done at 2013-10-06T15:36:25Z With DO : Measurement #1032221 for www.afnic.fr uses 489 probes 478 probes, 424 got a reply, 18 replies unparseable, 144 probes were apparently using a validator Average RT is 65.26 ms Test done at 2013-10-06T15:40:57Z
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Question about rt definition of DNS measurements
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Problems with one-off measurements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]