This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] probe allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gilles Massen
gilles.massen at restena.lu
Thu Nov 14 17:47:28 CET 2013
On 11/14/2013 10:19 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > With hindsight(!) this shows that adding and removing probes in > existing measurements was probably not such a good design choice, > although I supported it in order to allow repleneshing the probe pool > of long-running measurements. >From a simple user point of view I have mixed feelings toward that feature: on one hand it would prevent long running measurements from decaying, on the other hand if you run (multiple) measurements on a specific set of probes you might not want them to drift apart. Gilles -- Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU 6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg tel: (+352) 424409 fax: (+352) 422473
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]