This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Categorize probes (feature request)
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Categorize probes (feature request)
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Categorize probes (feature request)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gilles Massen
gilles.massen at restena.lu
Fri Nov 8 20:26:30 CET 2013
On 8/11/13, 18:03 , Klaus Darilion wrote: > Hi! > > Depending on the measurement, sometimes I want a realistic "user's view" > which means using probes in residential areas, and sometimes I want a > "backbone" view, which mean using probes in the back-bone (good > connected) e.g. to measure my access network or my servers without the > delay introduced by the probes access network. A kind of rough classification is asked when you register a probe, but apparently it cannot be changed later on, or used for filtering. It would be an interesting feature though. If it becomes an option, please allow multiple choices: currently the choices are exclusive. regards, Gilles
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Categorize probes (feature request)
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Categorize probes (feature request)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]