[atlas] msm_name in DNS measurements?

Grown-ups and never depend on undocumented features/data ..... ;-)

Sorry, could not resist ......

Daniel (who has been acting childishly from time to time)

> On 11/6/13 7:50 PM, Lars-Johan Liman wrote:
>> vnaumov at ripe.net:
>>> You can ignore it. It is for the system purposes.
>> Umm. This is a very disappointing answer. The RIPE NCC always prides
>> itself in being transparent. The answer above is not a supporting
>> fact.
>> 
>> It may well be that the field is for system purposes, but please do
>> describe those system purposes. We are engineers, not children.
>> 
>> 				Best regards,
>> 				  /Liman
>> #----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> # Lars-Johan Liman, M.Sc.               !  E-mail: liman at netnod.se
>> # Senior Systems Specialist             !  Tel: +46 8 - 562 860 12
>> # Netnod Internet Exchange, Stockholm   !  http://www.netnod.se/
>> #----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20131107/c890ad9e/attachment.sig>