[atlas] [mat-wg] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 07:09:34PM +0100, Pierre Blanchet wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Gilles Massen <gilles.massen at restena.lu>wrote:
> 
> > Anyway, making jobs private (forever or temporarily) means a lot to me,
> > and so I would be willing to tolerate quite some complexity (I know that
> > I'd hardly feel the cost personally...)
> 
> I host a probe because I believe Atlas is a valuable tool for the
> *community*. I do not host a probe to help you to debug your network and/or
> to keep the data for yourself.

Well, we host an Atlas Anchor, which we paid for ourselves, so we can use
this for diagnosing problems in our network - and which we are happy to
see used by other folks to improve their networks.

I don't particularily care for *your* probe, for which you didn't pay 
anything...

> Keeping the results public will make sure Atlas does not become a cheap
> monitoring solution for enterprises only.

Forcing all results to be public will result in Atlas not being used 
for things people will not want to see public, and *that* is quite likely
to result in people that are going to invest more into Atlas than "yeah,
give me a probe for free!" to, well, *not* invest.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20131224/8c4a6af2/attachment.sig>