This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Updated RIPE Atlas roadmap
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Updated RIPE Atlas roadmap
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] SOX (RS) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Dec 23 10:07:37 CET 2013
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote a message of 12 lines which said: > There have been quite a few requests for probe selection features. I > sort of wonder if those can be implemented without leading to > complexity that nobody can understand anymore. Seems reasonable. But, in that case, I would request, in exchange, that the default selection is improved to be actually random: there are apparently huge biases in the selection, so drawing quantitative conclusions ("x % of Atlas probes can ping www.example.com with IPv4") from default selection is dangerous.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Updated RIPE Atlas roadmap
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] SOX (RS) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]