[atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:23:56PM +0100, Vesna Manojlovic wrote:
> Our proposed plan is to make all *new* measurements and technical 
> information about the *new* probes public from an agreed upon date
> in the future. We propose implementing this change in mid-April.

I'd support changing the default to "public", but I can't see a compelling
reason why you would want to make *everything* public.  

What if I'm measuring something, where I know some bits of my network are
broken but need to figure out the overall damage, that I don't want the
competition and media to know (if they figure it out themselves, fine, but
not handing it on a silver platter).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20131217/4d4a91e9/attachment.sig>