This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Santcroos
mark at santcroos.net
Wed Jun 20 11:43:52 CEST 2012
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote: > I have to admit that we never investigated the extent of the jitter problem. Maybe the RIPE NCC could investigate the idea of creating a worldwide network of high accuracy measurement nodes. Time stamping could happen at (network) hardware level (or alternatively at kernel level) and the time source could be GPS. Oh wait :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]