This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Survey results on Atlas open-sourcing
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Survey results on Atlas open-sourcing
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Survey results on Atlas open-sourcing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Thu Jan 5 15:49:26 CET 2012
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:07:10PM +0100, Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina <inigo at infornografia.net> wrote a message of 81 lines which said: > I personally do not endorse the creation of further parallel, *public* > measurement platforms. They already exist (SamKnows, Grenouille, Bismark) so what's the point? Whether you endorse it or not, it happens. I am involved in a national measurement project in France <http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=8571&tx_gsactualite_pi1[uid]=1469&tx_gsactualite_pi1[backID]=1&cHash=a1c027a224> and Atlas is considered for the implementation but, of course, not being able to modify Atlas is a no-no.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Survey results on Atlas open-sourcing
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Survey results on Atlas open-sourcing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]