[atlas] Survey results on Atlas open-sourcing

"Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes at bbn.com> writes:

> Analyze as you will :)

One thing that strikes me from the discussion has been an absence of
answers to this question: What would reasons be to _not_ release the
source code?

I believe that unless there is a strong reason not to release the
source, it should be done because there is interest in it and there is
potential to get improvements out of it.

One reason could be that the current security architecture is based on
obscurity, but that discussion wasn't conclusive if I remember
correctly.  In that case, releasing things gradually might be a good
compromise, so that people can contribute a better security
architecture.

/Simon