This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Probe DNS entry A more useful than AAAA for dynamic IP hosts
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Probe DNS entry A more useful than AAAA for dynamic IP hosts
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe DNS entry A more useful than AAAA for dynamic IP hosts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Software Registrations
registrations at sardone.org
Tue Feb 14 12:52:03 CET 2012
Hello Robert, thanks for your reply but I do not understand your point about changing the UI and having A and AAAA records. I do not have A and AAAA records for my probe only AAAA. Are you saying that the probe now supports both? What firmware release are you referring to? Regards Fabio Sent from my iPad On 14/feb/2012, at 10:46, Robert Kisteleki <robert at ripe.net> wrote: > Hello, > > We found that it's way easier to implement this (adding both A and AAAA, if > applicable) than to change the UI. So this is done now. > > On a related note: we think it would be useful to add a time limit for > producing these records for disconnected probes. That is, remove these > entries if your probe has been down for some time, for example a week. > > Regards, > Robert > > > On 2012.02.11. 18:53, Software Registrations wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I have just received and put in service my probe. This is my first post to the list (I have been monitoring the traffic for a while: none). >> I wish to take the chance to admire the design and compact packaging ! Great work! >> >> Back on topic, for us low-lies with dynamic IP addresses using the probe DNS entry (maybe with a CNAME entry) could be a great way to ensure our Dynamic DNS entries are up to date and our network could be reached from remote. >> >> I am running a full IPv6 network receiving a /48 from Hurricane Electric and the probe tend to select (at least in my short experience) the autoconfigure (from MAC) IPv6 address as its Internet Address to use in the DNS record: >> >> fabio at atlantic:~$ host -t A pdxxxxx.probes.atlas.ripe.net >> pd456a699.probes.atlas.ripe.net has no A record >> fabio at atlantic:~$ host -t AAAA pdxxxxx.probes.atlas.ripe.net >> pd456a699.probes.atlas.ripe.net has IPv6 address 2001:470:xxxx:2:220:4aff:fee0:xxxx >> fabio at atlantic:~$ >> >> I saw that there are plans (in the FAQ) to add support both for AAAA and A records at the same time but I believe it would be beneficial for users to be able to select which record is generated or have the A record as default while waiting for the support for both to be implemented. >> >> Thanks for listening. >> >> Fabio >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Probe DNS entry A more useful than AAAA for dynamic IP hosts
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe DNS entry A more useful than AAAA for dynamic IP hosts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]