This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Transfer graphs
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Transfer graphs
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Transfer graphs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina
inigo at infornografia.net
Thu Feb 2 17:36:37 CET 2012
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Karrenberg < daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote: > Must be browser specific. My rendering: > > > On 02.02.2012, at 17:01, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > Hello, > > Is there any logic in the placement of the upper two graphs? > http://ompldr.org/vY2xhZQ/2012-02-02T155731Z-atlas.png > Looks like they were dropped randomly somewhere onto the page, without any > concern of how they would fit with the rest of the content. > > -- > With respect, > Roman > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > "Stallman had a printer, > with code he could not see. > So he began to tinker, > and set the software free." > > > I am experiencing the same graph layout problems Roman has pointed out, at least from my current location. Running Windows XP and Chrome v16.0.912.77. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20120202/832574a6/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen Shot 2012-02-02 at 17.28.41.png Type: image/png Size: 228113 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20120202/832574a6/attachment.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Transfer graphs
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Transfer graphs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]