This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas]Feature request (fo consideration): broadcast rate measurement?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]Feature request (fo consideration): broadcast rate measurement?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas]strange dns resolver display
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Apr 11 12:29:49 CEST 2011
Good points, thanks! Wilfried Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > On 09.04 12:42, Jesper Skriver wrote: > >>Hi >> >>As I see it the atlas project is about getting a global view. So in my book the last thing we want is stats about the local LAN segment the probe is connected to. Further more for privacy and security reasons the probes should in my mind gather as little information about the directly attached network as possible. >> >>/Jesper > > > I agree. Whhile this may be interesting it is the first step > on a slippery slope towards passive measurements which would > endagner confidence in the "we are not listening to your traffic" > message. > > Daniel >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]Feature request (fo consideration): broadcast rate measurement?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas]strange dns resolver display
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]