This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas]Upgrades today
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]Upgrades today
- Next message (by thread): [atlas]Upgrades today
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Sat Dec 11 14:06:32 CET 2010
On 10.12 17:57, Florian Obser wrote: > ... > > Gateway: Undetermined/Unknown > DNS Resolver: Undetermined/Unknown > > The probes have IPv6 connectivity so it should know it's gateway. Indeed it does. > Because a third probe of a colleague also shows undetermined/unknown I'm > guessing this isn't yet implemented, right? (If this should work and you > need the other probe ids to check something I can provide them next week) You are right, we intended 'undetermined' to mean that we do not have it implemented. It is on our list but not regarded as high priority. That whole section is intended to help debugging connectivity problems. Since there do not appear to be many of those it moved to a lower priority. > Second question: Can the probe get IPv6 resolvers over dhcpv6? If this > should work I'm going to look at deploying dhcpv6 just for the probes. ;) We have not implemented dhcpv6. Remember we are running uCLinux on a box with 8MB RAM and no MMU. How important is this? Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]Upgrades today
- Next message (by thread): [atlas]Upgrades today
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]