This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] RIPE Atlas for Saudi Arabia - how come so many abandoned?
- Previous message (by thread): [RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] RIPE Atlas for Saudi Arabia - how come so many abandoned?
- Next message (by thread): [RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] RIPE Atlas for Saudi Arabia - how come so many abandoned?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
philip.homburg at ripe.net
Thu May 9 11:33:19 CEST 2019
On 2019/05/08 21:12 , M. Tajbakhsh wrote: > I have tried setting that to smaller values, as well. Still, probes can > consume a big bulk of bytes just by a continuous monthly traffic of 5 > kbps. Not a big deal for some of hosts in practice, yet setting the > bandwidth low doesn't help if some people have issues with those few > gigabytes "swallowed" by these honorable guests, or if they are > concerned about missing more. Maybe you can bring this to the main ripe-atlas mailing list? So far we assume that 5 kbps is perfectly normal for a probe. And all probes get a collection of measurements that results in that load. If that load is a significant issue in some countries then it is worth discussing how we should continue. Philip
- Previous message (by thread): [RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] RIPE Atlas for Saudi Arabia - how come so many abandoned?
- Next message (by thread): [RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] RIPE Atlas for Saudi Arabia - how come so many abandoned?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]