This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/raci-list@ripe.net/
[RACI-list] Revisit arguments for Edge
- Previous message (by thread): [RACI-list] Revisit arguments for Edge
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Etienne-Victor Depasquale
edepa at ieee.org
Sun Jun 27 12:45:14 CEST 2021
As regards sustainability, I think that researchers need well conceived and articulated architectures of ***physical*** deployments of telecommunications networks. The analyzed substrate must be declared with as much transparency as possible. A primary limiting factor is the degree of willingness by operators to disclose implementational details. Abstractions that conceal physical elements lack conviction. Etienne On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:07 AM Aaron Ding <Aaron.Ding at tudelft.nl> wrote: > > Is the motive for Edge diminishing since its first concepts were > formulated more than a decade ago? > > A recent work to share on "*Revisiting the Arguments for Edge Computing > Research*" > https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.12224.pdf > > Aaron > -- > CPI Lab, TU Delft > https://cpi-lab.github.io/ > > _______________________________________________ > RACI-list mailing list > RACI-list at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/raci-list/attachments/20210627/d1ca1297/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [RACI-list] Revisit arguments for Edge
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]