[RACI-list] Revisit arguments for Edge

Thanks Etienne. Sustainability needs indeed hw/physical level transparency.

As for the list, this 'Revisit Edge' is now published on IEEE Internet Computing:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9470987

Aaron

________________________________
From: Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa at ieee.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2021 12:45
To: Aaron Ding
Cc: raci-list at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [RACI-list] Revisit arguments for Edge

As regards sustainability,

I think that researchers need well conceived and articulated architectures of ***physical*** deployments of telecommunications networks.

The analyzed substrate must be declared with as much transparency as possible.
A primary limiting factor is the degree of willingness by operators to disclose implementational details.

Abstractions that conceal physical elements lack conviction.

Etienne

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:07 AM Aaron Ding <Aaron.Ding at tudelft.nl<mailto:Aaron.Ding at tudelft.nl>> wrote:


Is the motive for Edge diminishing since its first concepts were formulated more than a decade ago?

A recent work to share on "Revisiting the Arguments for Edge Computing Research"
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.12224.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__arxiv.org_pdf_2106.12224.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=Iui-R0PdSAiRXYstq499vMjc_0AA9xFpAzYBY5yBmJc&m=RWzOOGJ_EZHTeUpADwTf_vyzl5IYdxkVS7hzxgh7sK0&s=isE3ia4xAG891EQe2gcE8thlR-1EJXVgNBfxqPGIYMc&e=>

Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/raci-list/attachments/20210703/34f36e63/attachment.html>