[policy-announce] [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)

* Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet

> Each and every existing policy is subject to review, change and/or improvement.
> Thus, when there is a proposal to amend existing policy text, this might be a
> good point in time to have a look at the whole set of provisions.

I disagree.

> "
> LIRs that receive a re-allocation from another LIR cannot re-allocate complete
> or partial blocks of the same address space to another LIR within 24 months of
> receiving the re-allocation.
> "

> "
> The block that is to be re-allocated must not be smaller than the minimum
> allocation block size at the time of re-allocation.
> "

Your questions are off topic, as both of those sentences you quoated are
not modified in any way by 2012-05.

You are of course free to start a new discussion about them, submit a
new proposal to change them, and so forth. But please, don't hijack the
2012-05 thread.

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com