<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"> </head> <body> <div style="/* inherit */" class="main-style-844ac4571f804d6d23e2"> <div>Hi Gert,</div> <div><br> </div> <div>I do actually think that would be a good option, yes.</div> <div><br> </div> <div>Alternatively, the NCC should require all or multiple LIR contacts to confirm the request, or at the very least allow specific persons at the LIR to make them only. Ideally, this would mimic the requirements for execution of a contract <b>by</b> the company (not on its behalf as would be usual for most contracts). These may differ by country (and potentially even by company based on its articles), so the notary option is the easiest way to do this. For most companies, this would likely mean signatures from at least two directors or a director's signature plus a seal or stamp.</div> <div><br> </div> <div>If this is indeed done via notary the procedure would be fairly simple indeed. The NCC already accepts notarized statements in many cases (in fact I have had to make a sworn statement at a notary for a transfer request in the past) and is already equipped to verify them. If that isn't possible for a specific country or notary, the NCC can also request an apostille which is generally easy to verify.</div> <div><br> </div> <div>The transfer lock can have severe financial impact on an LIR and there is a significant risk of it being abused. There must be safeguards against this. The other problem is of course, as Alex raised, that if whatever method the NCC used is found by a court to not actually be binding on the company, the NCC may be subject to legal liability for refusing a transfer request under it.</div> <br> <div class="front-signature"> <div>�</div> <div>Maria Merkel</div> <div><img style="width: 118px; height: 14.75px;" src="https://cdn.staclar.com/logos/novecore/newlogo.png"></div> <div><br> </div> <div><span style="font-size: 10px;">This email was sent by Staclar, Inc. Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated.</span></div> <div><br> </div> <div><span style="font-size: 10px;">Novecore and Staclar are collective trading names of Novecore Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 11748197, Novecore Licensing Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 11544982, Staclar Carrier Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 12219686, Staclar Financial Services Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 13843292 (registered offices 54 Portland Place, London, UK, W1B 1DY); Novecore Professional Services Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 13965912 (registered office 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, UK, BH16 6FA); Novecore (Estonia) O�, registered in Estonia under registry code 16543205 (local contact Baltic Business Services O�, Narva mnt 5, 10117 Tallinn, Estonia); Novecore (USA) Inc., registered in Delaware under file number 6707907, Novecore Licensing (USA) LLC, registered in Delaware under file number 4030866, and Staclar, Inc., registered in Delaware under file number 7413401 (registered agents The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange St, Wilmington DE 19801, USA). Novecore Licensing Ltd. is registered for VAT in the United Kingdom under VAT registration number 347 4545 80. Novecore (Estonia) O� is registered for VAT in the European Union under VAT registration number EE102518979. Novecore Professional Services Ltd. is a trust or company service provider registered with and supervised by HM Revenue & Customs under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (registration number XMML00000178208). Staclar Financial Services Ltd. is an Annex 1 financial institution registered with and supervised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (firm reference number 989521). Registration is not equivalent to authorisation and is not an endorsement to do business with a firm. Staclar Financial Services Ltd. is not an authorised person within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and does not review, approve, or endorse financial promotions for securities issues it is involved in or provide any form of investment advice.</span></div> </div> </div> <img alt="Sent from Front" aria-hidden="true" style="width: 1px; height: 1px" src="https://app.frontapp.com/api/1/noauth/companies/2fa1142cccd8fdcdb954/seen/msg_115pu0lm/0/909f044d.gif"><br> <blockquote type="cite" class="front-blockquote">On June 5, 2023 at 9:48 AM GMT+2 <a href="mailto:gert@space.net" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">gert@space.net</a> wrote:<br> <br> <div id="fae_115pu0lma94m8e">Hi, <br> <br> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:40:01AM +0200, Alex Le Heux wrote: <blockquote type="cite" class="front-blockquote"><br> > Not everyone agrees with that. <br> <br> So you're saying that for this policy to become effective, the NCC should <br> require paperwork with interesting logos and stamps on it, issued by some <br> random official somewhere in one of the many jurisdictions, and spend our <br> moneyz on verification that this is indeed a legally binding statement <br> by the authorized LIR contact (and not a photoshopped version)? <br> <br> Gert Doering <br> -- NetMaster <br> -- <br> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? <br> <br> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer <br> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann <br> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) <br> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 <br> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </body> </html>