This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Update of RIPE NCC Procedural Document and Transfer Agreement Template
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Update of RIPE NCC Procedural Document and Transfer Agreement Template
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Update of RIPE NCC Procedural Document and Transfer Agreement Template
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
maxtul at netassist.ua
Sat May 20 15:58:33 CEST 2023
On Sat, 20 May 2023 11:43:19 +0200 Олена Кушнір <kea at webpro.net.ua> wrote: > Good day, All/Max > There is no need for fairy tales about 5 thousand euros for a court decision. That is not a fairy tale, I said also "or just for free, if you have enough political resource", like in your master's case. > I am categorically against this proposal 2.2, because in this case, those from whom the IP resources were stolen will NEVER GET THEM BACK. And what then is justice? But yes, you are right. In the case resource was stealed, it should be returned back to the legal owner. The question is how to figure out it was stealed and it is not a seller's fraud. Any ideas? -- Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Update of RIPE NCC Procedural Document and Transfer Agreement Template
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Update of RIPE NCC Procedural Document and Transfer Agreement Template
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]